Comments on: Top U.s. Healthcare Staffing Providers

By: Blogger

Blogger — Tue, 29 Dec 2009 14:31:56 +0000

Goshh…. gus is right!! this is amazing & you are so amazing!!
Beautiful…

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 29 Dec 2009 11:05:41 +0000

Man, you’re good at that.

I like your subject matter, too.

I can write music til the cows come home but I always tell people that I can’t “draw water”. haha.

Thanks for the invite. Rare treat.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 28 Dec 2009 16:53:41 +0000

prodigious!

By: Free Blog

Free Blog — Mon, 28 Dec 2009 07:42:48 +0000

Wow! Seriously, that looks like real picture!

By: acron_23

acron_23 — Mon, 28 Dec 2009 04:35:27 +0000

That would probably be private information. HMO's have fee schedules that list what they allow for certain procedures, but that's probably not available except to providers. They don't "look at information" – they have set schedules, for the most part.

Why would that be important to you in looking for a possible career??

By: Mr. Cub

Mr. Cub — Mon, 28 Dec 2009 03:49:24 +0000

Don't get sick!

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 28 Dec 2009 01:27:45 +0000

lemme just say… you are my new hero.

By: lovslinky

lovslinky — Mon, 28 Dec 2009 00:18:27 +0000

I am English and now live in California. Like most people I thought that there was a huge tax burden in Britain, but after coming here I now think that's not the case.We pay two forms of tax from our wages:Income tax and National insurance. Your income tax is tax like everywhere else, national insurance pays for your pension and healthcare. I have lived in England all my life up till now and I will fiercely defend our healthcare system, the NHS (national health service). In thanks largely to the effort of our heroic doctors and nurses (and all other staff) the NHS survives….the healthcare is nothing like as bad as people make out, and there are no long waiting lists anymore (now if you're waiting more than six months for routine surgery they'll send you abroad to have it done, paid for of course). No-one pays anything for medical care and the one reason it's under stress (As a healthcare proffesional I know this from experience) is the fact that something built as a national health service is used as a world health service. People come to the UK from all over Europe to take advantage of the NHS and from all over the world. I would like to see treatment restricted to citizens/people who have paid at least 5 years national insurance contributions but at the same time I would never ever want to see anyone, citizen or not, turned away or denied medical care because of money. I'm fortunate enough to be able to afford health insurance in the US but the amount hospitals/doctors charge is disgusting and I don't really understand why people are so opposed to universal health care, can you really put a price on life?
By the way income tax is 20% of anything you earn over about 5 and a half thouse pounds ($11k) and national insurance is 11% of anything you earn over 84pounds a week ($160) And people have the option of private healthcare in england too if they want to pay for it

By: Teena

Teena — Sun, 27 Dec 2009 05:09:31 +0000

Since the drug companies became privatized, there have been far, far less cures than when it was government controlled. Drug companies only want symptom relievers, since they will be reused over and over, whereas cures are not needed once the problem is gone. No money in cures. Drug companies are more interested in Marketing. Obscene amounts go into marketing. At least thousands if not millions are spent on just pens, clocks, notepads, lunches, clipboards, and a ton of little practically useless stuff they give away for the sole purpose of having the name all around the dr. You should go in a dr's office and just look at the amount of stuff with a drug name on it. That is only a small fraction. The government should really take back the pharmaceutical industry, that would definitely lower regular health insurance prices.

If universal health care is brought in, it doesn't mean you can't get regular health insurance. Considering how very little the health insurances pay out ($0.67 on a $10 charge) I highly doubt that the doctors income would be impacted negatively.

I think universal health care would be a great thing. And this is coming from someone who would probably have to find a new job. You don't see the people who come in who don't have to money to get seen. People who are already sick, dying, and still getting harassed about payments. There are already tons of people who die because they just didn't have the money for a doctor. What is a couple of days wait to that?

6 months is quite far fetched. I was in the military, and the same type of system ran. Health care was FREE and there were no massive wait times.

The only valid complaint that I have heard is that you would not always be able to see the same doctor. Not exactly a big deal.

It could very well be that some doctors could choose to take more regular health insurance patients, and then you could have one of those for your regular doctor.

As atrocious as regular health insurance is, most doctors take most of them. Why? To boost the number of patients. Universal health care could work the same way.

Universal health care will certainly not stop the advancement of medicine. With a little less fear involved, it may even enhance it. Besides, that sounds an awful lot like you want to believe the US is the only place in the world who has helped medicine. Nope.

Would you give up your career to keep universal health care from coming?

That's how strongly I support it.

By: WPBlog Shop

WPBlog Shop — Sun, 27 Dec 2009 03:59:55 +0000

really cool.